I have reason to believe the Church and through it the United States missed our initial opportunity to both re-elect Donald Trump and strike down wickedness in this nation.
Some were complacent, thinking these tremendous blessings were their due and that no effort or sacrifice was required of them.
Others couldn’t get past their inexplicable aversion to President Trump, apparently preferring a geriatric, corrupt, abortion-loving dullard to a brash New Yorker who offended their delicate sensibilities.
In the immediate aftermath, a new group has emerged: the virtuous over-qualifiers. I find this group particularly repugnant.
I don’t know if they’re motivated by cowardice, a desire to have people follow them and buy their dumb books, or both but the result is the same.
These over-qualifiers want to make sure we know this was never about Trump for them, as if he accomplished nothing of value during his miraculous first term.
They think it’s important we know that in their “expert” opinion all the prophets who said Trump would serve two terms just got emotional and excited and gave false words.
Can someone please explain to me the virtues of reticence, caution, character assassination or appeasement? This is a great nation, and great nations should be inhabited by courageous, risk taking men and women, not preening, condescending cowards.
The state of our nation right is often compared to the American Civil War. This comparison is apt and brings a question to my mind. Which General are you in this crucial hour? George McClellan or Ulysses S. Grant?
McClellan was adored by his troops when he led the Union army, but for all the wrong reasons. He was hesitant with his forces, always afraid of losing them or hurting them. He never took chances, never acted decisively, and quailed in the face of uncertainties.
Because he coddled them, his men loved him but he accomplished nothing of significance and he’s now a mere footnote in history.
Grant was just the opposite. I don’t particularly care for the man or the Union army in general (a topic for another time) but I cannot question his results.
From the day he assumed command of the Army of the Potomac , Grant played for keeps. He took chances, made big gambles and fought without concern for the lives of his men. He hounded and punished the Confederacy at every turn, bleeding them until they finally broke in a bloody but effective war of attrition.
This is a time for bold strokes and decisive victories, no matter the cost. If we continue to play nice and play back like McClellan, our entire country will fade into obscurity along with every freedom we hold dear.
However, if we flip the script like Grant and fight every way we can and win any way we can, we will be a part of changing history and saving our glorious republic from the jaws of globalist tyrants.
So which General are you?